Skip to content
Aarrange

CodeBeautify Alternatives: 7 Secure Code Formatters After the 2025 Leak

A privacy-first guide to code formatters for developers who handle sensitive data.

Updated We make Aarrange, and we rate it by the same rules as the others.

Quick comparison

ToolScorePrivacyPriceSign-upVerdict
1Aarrange14 / 15In your browserFreeNoneBroadest browser-only toolkit; no JavaScript formatter.
2Prettier Playground13 / 15In your browserFreeNoneExact Prettier output; formatting only.
3JS Beautifier12 / 15In your browserFreeNoneBest for unminifying JavaScript; three languages only.
4Browser DevTools12 / 15In your browserFreeNoneAlready installed and fully local; not a real formatter.
5JSON Editor Online11 / 15In your browserFreemiumOptionalBest tree view; advanced features cost money.
6CSS Portal9 / 15On their serverFreeNoneStrong CSS toolbox; code goes to their server.
7Dan's Tools9 / 15On their serverFreeNoneBroad grab-bag of utilities; most run on a server.
On this page

Scores

Updated

Out of 5, from what each tool does. The reasons are in the reviews below.

ToolPrivacyFeaturesPrice
Aarrange545
Prettier Playground535
JS Beautifier525
Browser DevTools525
JSON Editor Online434
CSS Portal135
Dan's Tools135

Why developers are looking for CodeBeautify alternatives

CodeBeautify.com was one of the most popular multi-language code formatting tools on the web. Developers used it to format JSON, XML, HTML, CSS, SQL and dozens of other languages. In November 2025 it became clear how much of what people pasted into it, and into its sister site JSONFormatter.org, could be read by anyone.

November 2025: saved snippets were publicly reachableResearchers at watchTowr Labs downloaded more than 80,000 saved submissions (over 5 GB) from JSONFormatter.org and CodeBeautify.org, covering five years of JSONFormatter content and one year of CodeBeautify content. They found credentials, API keys, private keys and access tokens among them. If you ever used the Save button on either site, treat that content as public and rotate any secret it contained.

This was not a hack. Both sites have a Save button that stores your input on their server under a shareable link, and a public Recent Links page that lists recently saved items. The links also follow a predictable format, so a simple script could collect them in bulk. watchTowr planted fake cloud credentials as a test and saw someone try them about 48 hours later, a sign that others were already scraping these pages for secrets. According to The Hacker News, both sites then temporarily disabled the save function.

The lesson is simple: once a formatting tool stores your data on a server, your data is only as safe as that tool's design and security. Something most developers think of as harmless ended up publishing production credentials and internal configuration.

Below, we compare seven CodeBeautify alternatives. Privacy and where the processing happens are weighted heavily in our rankings. The safest formatter is one that never sees your data in the first place.

How we compared them

We tried each tool with real-world code across several languages: JSON configs, SQL queries, HTML templates and CSS stylesheets. For each one we note where your code is processed, which languages and actions it covers, and what it costs.

Detailed reviews

01

Aarrange

Broadest browser-only toolkit; no JavaScript formatter.

Privacy
In your browser
Price
Free
Sign-up
None
Privacy
Everything runs in the browser
Features
Most formats and validation; no JavaScript formatter
Price
Free, no sign-up

Pros

  • Runs entirely in the browser, your data never leaves your machine
  • Formats JSON, SQL, HTML, CSS, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV and Markdown
  • JSON Schema validation (Ajv, drafts 07, 2019-09 and 2020-12) and JSON to YAML or XML conversion built in
  • JSON Validator shows the exact error line and column with a fix hint, plus a tree view
  • Free, with no sign-up and no ads

Cons

  • Newer and small, still building its community
  • No JavaScript or TypeScript formatter
  • No dark mode or themes

CodeBeautify built its reputation on breadth, supporting dozens of languages and conversions. Aarrange takes a similar multi-language approach, but every operation runs in your browser. No API calls carry your code anywhere, and there is no Save button that stores it on a server. Your code stays in your browser tab.

Today Aarrange has 23 free tools. The JSON Validator points to the exact line and column of an error with a hint for the fix, and can format, minify, sort keys and show the data as a tree. The JSON Schema Validator uses Ajv with drafts 07, 2019-09 and 2020-12, and can generate a schema or a sample. Like CodeBeautify, Aarrange has a JWT decoder: the JWT Decoder decodes a token in your browser and verifies its signature with your key. Base64 Decode decodes and encodes Base64 text and files, and shows a decoded image. There are converters from JSON to YAML and XML, formatters for YAML, TOML, CSV, XML, Markdown, HTML, CSS and SQL, and a MySQL to PostgreSQL converter.

It is still a small site. There is no JavaScript formatter and no dark mode. But if you relied on CodeBeautify for its range of formatters, Aarrange is the closest replacement that keeps your data off someone else's server.

02

Prettier Playground

Exact Prettier output; formatting only.

Privacy
In your browser
Price
Free
Sign-up
None
Privacy
Runs in the browser
Features
Many languages, formatting only
Price
Free

Pros

  • Runs Prettier directly in the browser
  • Identical output to local Prettier installations
  • Full configuration panel for every Prettier option
  • AST view for understanding how Prettier parses your code

Cons

  • Only formats, no validation, minification or conversion
  • Limited to languages Prettier supports (no SQL, TOML or CSV)
  • No file upload or batch processing

The official Prettier playground lets you test Prettier's opinionated formatting in the browser. It supports JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, HTML, JSON, GraphQL, Markdown and YAML.

If you already use Prettier in your CI pipeline or editor, the playground is the obvious choice for quick formatting checks. It runs the actual Prettier library in the browser, so the output matches what you would get locally. The configuration panel exposes every option (print width, tab width, trailing commas, bracket spacing), which makes it handy for settling team debates about code style.

The downside is that Prettier is strictly a formatter. It will not validate your JSON, convert between formats or minify anything. If you need SQL, TOML or CSV formatting, you will have to look elsewhere.

03

JS Beautifier

Best for unminifying JavaScript; three languages only.

Privacy
In your browser
Price
Free
Sign-up
None
Privacy
Runs js-beautify in the browser
Features
Three languages, formatting only
Price
Free and open source

Pros

  • Fully client-side, runs js-beautify in the browser
  • Handles JavaScript, HTML and CSS formatting
  • Useful for deobfuscating minified JavaScript
  • Open source with a large community

Cons

  • Limited to three languages (JS, HTML, CSS)
  • No JSON validation, conversion or schema checking
  • Interface feels dated compared to modern tools

JS Beautifier (beautifier.io) is the web interface for the popular js-beautify library used in many editors and build tools. It has been around for over a decade and remains the go-to tool for unminifying JavaScript. If you have ever needed to make sense of a webpack bundle or a minified library, this is what you reach for. It handles packed, obfuscated and minified code well, and it also formats HTML and CSS, though without the depth of dedicated tools.

The limitation is clear: three languages, formatting only. No validation, no conversion, no JSON-specific features. If CodeBeautify was your Swiss Army knife, JS Beautifier is more like a very good screwdriver.

04

Browser DevTools

Already installed and fully local; not a real formatter.

Privacy
In your browser
Price
Free
Sign-up
None
Privacy
Everything stays on your machine
Features
Pretty-print and JSON tree only
Price
Built into the browser

Pros

  • Already installed, zero setup required
  • Fully local processing with no data transmission
  • Integrated into your existing debugging workflow
  • Handles large files and network responses well

Cons

  • No standalone formatting, tied to browser context
  • Cannot paste arbitrary code for formatting
  • No conversion, validation or export features

Chrome and Firefox DevTools are the most private option on this list. Everything stays on your machine by definition. The Sources panel can pretty-print minified JavaScript and CSS with a single click, which covers the common "I need to read this minified code" case. The Network tab shows JSON responses as a tree you can expand and collapse.

DevTools is not really a formatter in the usual sense, though. You cannot paste arbitrary code to beautify it, you cannot choose indentation settings, and there is no conversion or validation. Think of it as a complement to a dedicated tool rather than a standalone CodeBeautify replacement.

05

JSON Editor Online

Best tree view; advanced features cost money.

Privacy
In your browser
Price
Freemium
Sign-up
Optional
Privacy
Free tier local; paid tier syncs
Features
Rich JSON tools, JSON only
Price
Freemium, advanced features paid

Pros

  • Excellent tree view for navigating deeply nested structures
  • Client-side processing in the free tier
  • JMESPath query support for filtering large payloads
  • Clean, well-maintained interface

Cons

  • Advanced features locked behind a paid plan
  • Struggles with very large files (10 MB and up)
  • Paid tier uses cloud sync, which sends data to servers

JSON Editor Online is arguably the best dedicated JSON editor on the web. The two-pane layout, code on the left and tree on the right, makes deeply nested objects easy to understand. It also supports formatting, validation and JMESPath queries. The free version covers everyday formatting and validation, and it all runs locally.

Where it falls short as a CodeBeautify replacement is scope: it only handles JSON. If you used CodeBeautify for HTML, CSS or SQL formatting, you will need other tools. The paid tier adds cloud storage and collaboration, which means your data starts going to servers. Stick with the free version for anything sensitive.

06

CSS Portal

Strong CSS toolbox; code goes to their server.

Privacy
On their server
Price
Free
Sign-up
None
Privacy
Code is processed on their server
Features
Deep CSS tools, narrow scope
Price
Free, no account

Pros

  • Full CSS toolset: formatters, generators, validators
  • Includes gradient generators, flexbox builders and other CSS utilities
  • Free with no account required

Cons

  • Server-side processing, data is sent to their backend
  • Heavy advertising that clutters the interface
  • Narrow focus on CSS and HTML only

CSS Portal is a collection of CSS-focused tools, worth bookmarking if you spend most of your day in stylesheets. The tools go beyond formatting: gradient generators, box-shadow builders, flexbox playgrounds and media query helpers all speed up prototyping.

As a CodeBeautify alternative, though, it has two real drawbacks. First, it processes code on the server, so your CSS is sent to their servers for formatting. Second, the scope is narrow. Need JSON, SQL, YAML or anything outside CSS? You are out of luck. The ad-heavy interface also makes long sessions tedious.

07

Dan's Tools

Broad grab-bag of utilities; most run on a server.

Privacy
On their server
Price
Free
Sign-up
None
Privacy
Most tools process on a server
Features
Broad but basic tools
Price
Free

Pros

  • Covers a wide range of developer utilities in one place
  • Includes encoding, decoding and hash tools
  • Simple, no-nonsense interface

Cons

  • Server-side processing for most tools
  • Formatting output lacks customization options
  • Tools feel basic compared to dedicated alternatives

Dan's Tools is the closest in spirit to CodeBeautify, a grab-bag of developer utilities under one roof. You get JSON, XML, HTML and CSS formatters alongside Base64 encoders, URL decoders and hash generators. Decent breadth.

The problem is that most tools send your data to a server for processing. Individual tools are also fairly basic: no syntax highlighting, no configuration options, nothing you would call advanced. It works in a pinch, but if you are leaving CodeBeautify to keep your code off other people's servers, Dan's Tools does not solve that.

Search interest

How often people search Google for each tool by name, month by month over five years. It shows which names people know, not how many people use the tool. Google compares at most five names at a time, so this chart joins two searches that share JSON Editor Online.

Average search interest per tool, 0 to 100
Tool5 yearsPast year
JSON Editor Online7152
JS Beautifier2513
CodeBeautify713
CSS Portal<1<1
Prettier Playground<1<1
Aarrange<10
Dan's Tools<10
Source: Google Trends, worldwide web search, Oct 2021 to Oct 2026 (Oct 2026 is a part month). This is search interest, not visits: 100 is the busiest month of any name in this chart, and the table shows averages. Fetched 2026-10-14.

Full feature comparison

This table compares every major feature across all seven alternatives: full support, partial support, or missing.

FeatureAarrangePrettier PlaygroundJS BeautifierBrowser DevToolsJSON Editor OnlineCSS PortalDan's Tools
Core features
Format / BeautifyYesYesYesPartlyYesYesYes
ValidateYesPartlyNoNoYesPartlyPartly
MinifyYesNoNoNoYesYesPartly
Convert between formatsYesNoNoNoNoPartlyPartly
Language support
JSONYesYesNoPartlyYesNoYes
JavaScript / TypeScriptNoYesYesYesNoNoNo
HTMLYesYesYesNoNoYesYes
CSSYesYesYesYesNoYesYes
SQLYesNoNoNoNoNoNo
YAML / TOML / XMLYesPartlyNoNoNoNoPartly
Privacy and security
Client-side processingYesYesYesYesYesNoNo
No data sent to a serverYesYesYesYesPartlyNoNo
Works offlinePartlyNoNoYesNoNoNo
Additional
Dark modeNoNoNoYesYesNoNo
Customizable themesNoNoNoPartlyPartlyNoNo
Free (no limits)YesYesYesYesPartlyYesYes

Privacy audit: where does your code go?

After the CodeBeautify and JSONFormatter.org exposure, the first question to ask about any formatting tool is simple: does my code leave my machine? Here is how each alternative handles it.

Client-side tools: your code stays localAarrange, Prettier Playground, JS Beautifier and Browser DevTools process everything in your browser. You can check this yourself: open your browser's Network tab while you use the tool and look for requests that carry your input. JSON Editor Online also processes locally in the free tier, though the paid tier involves cloud storage.
Server-side tools: your code leaves your machineCSS Portal and Dan's Tools send your code to their servers for processing. Once your code is on someone else's server, you depend on how that service stores, logs and shares it. Do not paste API keys, database credentials, private keys or any other sensitive data into these tools.

The pattern is straightforward. A tool that processes or saves your code on a server can expose it, through a bug, a breach or a feature like a public list of saved links. Client-side processing removes that whole category of risk: your code never crosses the network, is never logged on a server and never sits in a database waiting to be found.

Our verdict

CodeBeautify's strength was always its breadth: one site for formatting dozens of languages. If you want that same convenience without sending your code to a server, Aarrange is the strongest replacement. It covers JSON, SQL, HTML, CSS, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV and Markdown, all processed entirely in your browser, with no sign-up and no ads.

For JavaScript formatting, Prettier Playground gives you the same output as your local Prettier setup. JSON Editor Online is the best option if you need a rich tree view for exploring JSON. And for deobfuscating minified JavaScript, JS Beautifier remains the standard.

The 2025 findings showed that a formatter which stores your input on a server is a liability. Every tool on this list that processes code client-side is safer in that respect than CodeBeautify. Pick the one that fits your workflow, but make sure your code stays on your machine.

FAQ

What happened to CodeBeautify and JSONFormatter.org in November 2025?

watchTowr Labs showed that content saved with the sites' Save button could be read by anyone, through the public Recent Links page and predictable link formats. They downloaded more than 80,000 saved submissions and found credentials, API keys and private keys among them.

It was not a hack: the data was reachable through the sites' own features.

Should I rotate secrets I pasted into CodeBeautify?

If you ever saved content containing a password, token or key with the Save button on CodeBeautify or JSONFormatter.org, treat it as public and rotate it. watchTowr saw planted fake credentials being tried within about 48 hours, so others were already scraping the saved content.

What is the best CodeBeautify alternative?

For broad, multi-language formatting in the browser, we rank Aarrange first. For JavaScript and TypeScript, use Prettier Playground. For exploring JSON as a tree, JSON Editor Online. For unminifying JavaScript, JS Beautifier.

Which CodeBeautify alternatives keep my code in the browser?

Aarrange, Prettier Playground, JS Beautifier and Browser DevTools process everything locally. JSON Editor Online is local in the free tier. CSS Portal and Dan's Tools send your code to their servers.

Does Aarrange format JavaScript?

No. Aarrange covers JSON, SQL, HTML, CSS, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV and Markdown. For JavaScript or TypeScript, use Prettier Playground or JS Beautifier.

Is Aarrange free?

Yes. All 23 tools are free, run in your browser and need no sign-up. There are no ads.